By clicking “Accept All Cookies”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information.
Articles

Containment Bottlenecks: Why Most Breaches Escalate Before You Can Act

April 25, 2025
This article explores one of the most overlooked vulnerabilities in modern cybersecurity operations: the delay between when a threat is detected and when it is actually contained. We’ll uncover the root causes of these containment bottlenecks, their real-world consequences, and how to fix them with intelligent automation.

In today’s cybersecurity landscape, organizations are investing heavily in detection systems. SIEMs, EDRs, NDRs, and advanced threat intelligence platforms promise to identify malicious activity as soon as it occurs. But even with this digital arsenal, breaches continue to happen. Why?

Because detection alone is not enough. The real issue lies in what happens after detection: containment. And in most organizations, containment is where everything falls apart.

This article explores one of the most overlooked vulnerabilities in modern cybersecurity operations: the delay between when a threat is detected and when it is actually contained. We’ll uncover the root causes of these containment bottlenecks, their real-world consequences, and how to fix them with intelligent automation.

The Anatomy of Containment Bottlenecks

1. Alert Fatigue and Prioritization Paralysis

Security analysts are inundated with alerts every day. Studies show that over 80% of alerts are false positives. SOC teams spend countless hours triaging, correlating, and validating these alerts. In the meantime, real threats are buried in the noise.

Even when a high-priority alert is recognized, determining the scope and severity of the incident takes time. Analysts must:

  • Review event logs
  • Correlate telemetry across tools
  • Investigate anomalies manually
  • Verify whether the alert is actionable

This "detection-to-decision" gap is the first and most dangerous bottleneck.

2. Fragmented Security Tools

In many organizations, the tools used for detection, investigation, and containment are not integrated. An analyst may need to:

  • Investigate in the SIEM
  • Validate in an EDR console
  • Raise a ticket in a case management system
  • Send messages through Slack or email

Each handoff introduces delay. Each manual step increases the chance for error or oversight.

3. Manual Containment Is Too Slow

Once a threat is confirmed, actions like isolating a system, disabling a user, or blocking a domain still require human intervention. The process typically involves:

  • Identifying the correct system or user
  • Communicating with stakeholders
  • Executing the action in the respective tool
  • Logging the incident and reporting the action

These actions, when done manually, can take minutes to hours. In the time it takes to isolate a compromised device, malware could already have moved laterally across the network.

4. Lack of Contextual Awareness

Most SOC tools do not provide automated context about:

  • Who owns the compromised asset
  • What business process it supports
  • Whether it's part of a critical application or system

This lack of visibility creates hesitation. Security teams delay containment out of fear they might disrupt core operations, leading to escalated breaches.

Real-World Consequences of Containment Delay

  • Ransomware Spreading Laterally: A single uncontained endpoint becomes a gateway for network-wide encryption.
  • Credential Stuffing Escalation: Delay in disabling compromised accounts results in unauthorized access to sensitive systems.
  • Data Exfiltration: Even seconds matter when a threat actor is actively stealing files. The longer the delay, the higher the data loss.
  • Brand Damage: News spreads fast. The public often learns of the breach before the internal team contains it.

These scenarios are not hypothetical. They happen every day.

Brahma Fusion by Peris.ai empowers SOCs with Agentic-AI and Hyperautomation to isolate threats instantly, reducing MTTR and breach risk.
Brahma Fusion by Peris.ai empowers SOCs with Agentic-AI and Hyperautomation to isolate threats instantly, reducing MTTR and breach risk.

The Way Forward: Intelligent, Automated Containment

To fix containment bottlenecks, organizations must shift from manual containment to AI-driven hyperautomation. This involves:

1. Introducing Agentic-AI in the SOC

Agentic-AI systems are not just reactive. They actively learn from past incidents, adapt containment strategies, and make autonomous decisions in real time. This enables:

  • Instant detection-to-decision transitions
  • Autonomous triggering of response actions
  • Continuous optimization of playbooks

2. Automated Playbook Execution

Hyperautomation allows organizations to:

  • Automatically isolate endpoints once indicators match known threats
  • Disable user accounts based on behavior anomalies
  • Block domains or IPs across firewall, DNS, and proxy layers

With minimal analyst input, containment becomes fast, consistent, and precise.

3. Real-Time Contextual Awareness

Solutions like Brahma Fusion integrate with business asset inventories, HR systems, and application dependency maps. This gives automated systems the confidence to:

  • Understand the business impact of containment
  • Prioritize assets based on criticality
  • Contain threats with reduced risk of operational disruption

4. Unified Dashboards and Orchestration

Instead of managing 5-10 separate tools, analysts can operate from a single pane of glass where:

  • Alerts are enriched automatically
  • Recommended actions are generated and executed
  • Full audit trails are logged

This orchestration removes the friction of human handoffs and enables rapid containment at scale.

Business Impact: Why Faster Containment Matters

Reduced MTTR (Mean Time to Respond)

  • From hours to seconds
  • Improves threat containment before lateral movement occurs

Lower Operational Costs

  • Fewer resources needed to manage incident response
  • Less downtime due to proactive isolation

Enhanced Analyst Productivity

  • Analysts focus on strategic analysis instead of manual tasks
  • Reduced burnout and turnover

Better Compliance and Audit Readiness

  • All containment actions are logged and justified
  • Reports are generated automatically for regulators

Stronger Security Posture

  • Confidence in stopping breaches before they escalate
  • Demonstrated resilience to board members and stakeholders

Final Thoughts: Containment Is the New Battleground

As attackers become faster, stealthier, and more sophisticated, the old way of doing things simply doesn’t work. Companies can no longer afford to rely on manual processes and fragmented tools when every second counts.

Containment is no longer just a technical task. It’s a strategic capability.

Agentic-AI and hyperautomation aren’t just buzzwords—they are the only way forward.

Platforms like Brahma Fusion by Peris.ai are proving that automated, intelligent containment is not only possible, but essential. With the ability to respond in real time, orchestrate actions across environments, and adapt over time, organizations can finally stop breaches before they spread.

Learn More

Explore how Brahma Fusion can help your organization accelerate containment, reduce risk, and build a truly modern SOC: 👉 Visit www.peris.ai

#ContainmentAutomation #SOCTransformation #AgenticAI #BrahmaFusion #PerisAI #Cybersecurity #YouBuild #WeGuard

There are only 2 type of companies:
Those that have been hacked, and
those who don't yet know they have been hacked.
Protect Your Valuable Organization's IT Assets & Infrastructure NOW
Request a Demo
See how it works and be amaze.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Interested in becoming our partner?
BECOME A PARTNER